Instead, we're going to
A few of the ground rules:
Never put me in your box if the shit eats tapes. |
2) Selling records <> talent. If sales meant that much, we would just narrow this down to Eminem and Jay-Z right now, and Vanilla Ice would be in the top five. That said, relevance (not the same thing as fame) is a factor. How much did the artist influence the art for the better (or worse)?
d) Making good music certainly helps the cause, but it's not the only thing that matters. Lots of rappers can make good songs while not being very good at rapping. Conversely, there are rappers who have incredible lyrical content but struggle to make listenable records. I'm partial to the latter.
7) When considering the body of work on record, though, consistent quality matters. Did the emcee put out consistently good product, or did a few tracks or albums get mailed in? Failure to live up to potential hurt a few people.
H) You'll notice an incredible imbalance in terms of the era from which most emcees on this list come. That's not so much a product of nostalgia as it is cold, hard reality. "Mainstream" rappers just aren't as good lyrically today — sorry, but it's a fact. Drake wouldn't have had a chance in hell at a record deal 20 years ago, and if you're the kind of person who thinks he belongs on a list of the top 500 rappers ever, much less 50, you're a fucking idiot.
zzz) When in doubt, the deciding factor was "If these two were to battle, who would win?"
I don't expect you to agree with this entire list, but then again, it's not yours. Make your own.
With a little bit of further ado...let's begin...
No comments:
Post a Comment